Skip to content

Astro vs Gatsby.

Two free frameworks for fast sites: one built for content and still adding features, one built on React and GraphQL with slower releases.

Feature by feature.

Rendering & Performance

FeatureAstroGatsby
Default outputStatic HTML, prerenderedStatic pages (SSG)
Other modesOn-demand rendering, server islandsDeferred static generation, server rendering
JavaScript in the browserNone unless you opt inReact, hydrated in the browser
ImagesBuilt-in Image and Picturegatsby-plugin-image

Data & Content

FeatureAstroGatsby
ContentContent collections with loadersGraphQL data layer
GraphQLNot neededOptional
UI frameworksReact, Vue, Svelte, Solid and moreReact only
PluginsOfficial and community integrationsOver 3,000 plugins

Upkeep & Backing

FeatureAstroGatsby
LicenceBoth MIT
Latest versionAstro 7.4 (October 2026)Gatsby 5.16.1 (February 2026)
Node.js22.22 or later18 to 25
Backed byCloudflare, since January 2026Netlify, since February 2023
Hosted serviceDeploys to Netlify, Vercel, Cloudflare or NodeGatsby Cloud closed; Netlify instead

Our conclusion.

Pick Astro for a new content site, because it sends less JavaScript by default and its team is still shipping major versions. Keep Gatsby when a site already runs well on it and your team knows its GraphQL data layer, and plan a move before you need new features.

Both are free under the MIT licence. Astro 7 came out in June 2026, and its team works on it full time at Cloudflare. Gatsby's latest release, 5.16.1, came out in February 2026 after 5.16 added React 19 and Node.js 24 support. Netlify, which Gatsby joined in 2023, says it does not plan for Gatsby to be where the main new ideas in frameworks happen.

Gatsby still has more than 3,000 plugins and a GraphQL layer that pulls data from many sources into one query. If you move a Gatsby site to Astro, its React components can come with you through Astro's React integration.

Other comparisons.

  • Astro vs Next.js


    Compare Astro and Next.js for marketing sites, content, SEO, hosting and app features.

    See Astro vs Next.js
  • Webflow vs Astro


    Compare Webflow and Astro on editing, SEO, hosting, cost and code ownership.

    Compare With Astro
  • Astro vs WordPress


    Compare Astro and WordPress on editing, plugins, speed, security and cost.

    See Astro vs WordPress

FAQ

Questions,
answered.

Still have a question?

Book a call with our director.

Or email us at info@carrilagency.com

No. It still gets releases (5.16.1 in February 2026) and commits, and Gatsby 5 is on long-term support. Netlify, which Gatsby joined in 2023, says it does not plan for Gatsby to be where the main new ideas in frameworks happen, so expect fixes more than features.

No neutral benchmark settles it for every site. By default Astro sends HTML and CSS with no JavaScript and adds it only to the parts you mark as interactive, while a Gatsby site loads React in the browser. For a content site, less JavaScript usually means a lighter page.

Yes. Astro's React integration renders your React components, so many of them can move as they are. The GraphQL queries are rewritten as Astro content collections or direct API calls, and old addresses keep their place with redirects.

Not by default. Astro reads content through collections with Zod schemas and loaders, and a page can still call any GraphQL API you already have.

Netlify ended Gatsby Cloud after Gatsby joined it in 2023 and moved customers to Netlify. Netlify says the change does not affect the Gatsby framework itself.

Yes. Gatsby is open source under the MIT licence, as Astro is. You pay for hosting and for the people who build the site.

Tell us what you are building.

Scope, cost, and timeline, mapped with you.

Book a Free Call

Trusted by 150+ teams worldwide